Corrections_Today_Spring_2025_Vol.87_No.1

REFERENCES Cook, E. R. (2020). Addressing Reentry Experiences in California During COVID-19. Davis, S. (2024). Interview with Sharon Davis, Bureau Chief, Florida Department of Corrections. Flaherty, R. (2024). Interview with Ryan Flaherty, Correctional Probation Senior Officer, Florida Department of Corrections. Goger, A., Harding, D. J., & Henderson, H. (2021). Rethinking Prisoner Reentry. Contexts, 20(4), 46-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/15365042211060738 Holston, H. (2024). Interview with Harriet Holston, Correctional Probation Officer, Florida Department of Corrections. Keena, L., & Krieger-Sample, L. (2018). Empathy-focused Learning: Teaching Criminal Justice Students to Care. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 43 , 389–410. Marcum, C. D. (2018). Executing an Offender Under Reentry Simulation Event: Teaching the Reality of Reentry to University Students. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 29 (2), 224-236. Meenaghan, A., McDermott, M., & Haggar, L. (2023). XR Technology and Risk Asessment: The Future of Probation Training? Criminology & Criminal Justice, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958231200346 Moak, S.C., Walker, J.T., Earwood, M. et al. Using Reentry Simulations to Promote Changes in Attitude Toward Offenders: Experiential Learning to Promote Successful Reentry. Am J Crim Just 45 , 126–144 (2020). https://doi. org/10.1007/s12103-019-09500-9 Perry, S. (2024). Interview with Stephanie Perry, Assistant Regional Director, Florida Department of Corrections. Reeves, K. R. (2020). Reentry Simulation Awareness Exercise: Its Impact on Key Stakeholders and the Process of Reintegration of Ex-Offenders. Wilmington University (Delaware). Ross, S., Wood, M. A., Baird, R., & Lundberg, K. (2024). Shaping the Techno-social Landscape of Corrections: How Values, Technology, and Culture Influence the Design of Correctional Service Delivery Applications. Journal of Criminology, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/26338076241255530 Russo, J., Vermeer, M. J., Woods, D., & Jackson, B. A. (2022). Leveraging Technology to Support Prisoner Reentry. RAND. Sparks, B., & Zidenberg, A. (2024). Accepting the Terms and Conditions: An Evaluation of a Parole- Based Experiential Assignment. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2023.2297443 Sugie, N. F. (2020). David J Harding, Jeffrey D Morenoff and Jessica JB Wyse. On the Outside: Prisoner Reentry and Reintegration. Punishment & Society, 22(3), 382-383. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474520904992

and empathy toward returning citizens. By gathering data on participants’ attitudes and behaviors before and after training, organizations can gauge the impact of Re entry Simulations on their professional practice. Additionally, tracking long-term outcomes, such as recidivism rates and successful reentry statistics, will be essential for demonstrating the value of these training tools. This focus on evaluation will not only enhance the credibility of Reentry Simulations but also foster continuous improvement efforts, ensuring that training programs remain responsive to the evolving needs of the field. Conclusion The future of Reentry Simulations holds great prom ise for transforming community corrections training. By leveraging technological advancements, integrating simulations into comprehensive training programs, emphasizing evaluation and outcomes, these innovative tools can significantly enhance the effectiveness of com munity corrections professionals. As agencies continue to prioritize the successful reentry of individuals into society, Reentry Simulations will play a vital role in fos tering empathy, understanding and informed support for those navigating the challenging journey of reintegration. Through these efforts, we can create a more supportive environment for returning citizens, ultimately contribut ing to safer and more resilient communities. The future of Reentry Simulations is poised to transform community corrections training significantly. By leveraging advancements in technology like virtual and augmented reality, we can create immersive experi ences that accurately reflect the challenges individuals face when transitioning from incarceration to society (Russo, Vermeer, Woods, and Jackson 2022). This hands-on approach deepens understanding, equipping professionals with the insights needed to effectively support their clients. Additionally, continuous evaluation of the simula tions will help measure their effectiveness in improving professional practices and reducing recidivism. By building a supportive framework through Reentry Simu lations, we can empower returning citizens to reclaim their lives and contribute to safer, more resilient commu nities for all. CT

Joe Winkler, the Assistant Secretary of Community Corrections at the Florida Department of Corrections, oversees operation of over 146 statewide probation offices and provides direction to correctional probation staff supervising adult felony offenders, bringing over two decades of experience in various roles within the department.

Spring 2025 | Corrections Today

55