Corrections_Today_Spring_2025_Vol.87_No.1

REENTRY

in South Florida or transportation challenges in the more rural Panhandle counties. To further ensure a rigorous evaluation of the training’s impact, Florida has utilized control groups — comparing staff who have not participated in Reen try Simulations to those who have. This method has revealed how simulations influence behaviors and out comes, particularly when comparing regions like urban Miami to rural North Florida. Finally, the most problematic challenge is linking outcomes directly to reductions in recidivism. Given the diverse needs of Florida’s probation population, the on going challenge remains to ensure the simulations lead to sustained positive changes in real-world settings. Future The future of Reentry Simulations will likely be shaped by advancements in technology. Virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) are already trans forming training methods across various professions, and community corrections. Incorporating VR into Reentry Simulations could create highly immersive experiences that replicate real-life scenarios in a more engaging and interactive manner (Meenaghan, McDermott, and Haggar 2023). Participants could navigate a simulated environment where they en counter various challenges, while receiving immediate feedback and support. Additionally, artificial intelligence (AI) could be leveraged to tailor simulations to individual participants’ experiences. By analyzing data from prior simulations and participant responses, AI could adapt scenarios to reflect specific challenges based on geographic location, demographic factors or the nature of an individual’s offense. This level of customization would enhance the relevance and impact of the training, ensuring partici pants are better prepared to address the unique needs of their clients (Ross, Wood, Baird, and Lundberg 2024). As Reentry Simulations gain traction, they will likely become integrated into broader training programs for community corrections professionals. Currently, many organizations use simulations as standalone exercises; however, the future may see these tools embedded within a comprehensive curriculum that includes theoretical frameworks, policy analysis and practical

skills development. This integration would allow for a more holistic approach to training, where the knowledge gained from simulations is reinforced through classroom instruction and real- world application. Additionally, partnerships with academic institu tions could help standardize the curriculum surrounding Reentry Simulations (Keena and Krieger 2018). By col laborating with universities and research organizations, community corrections agencies can develop evidence based training modules that incorporate exemplary practices and the latest research findings (Marcum 2018). This academic rigor would enhance the credibility and effectiveness of Reentry Simulations, making them essential components of professional development. In addition, the voices of individuals with lived experiences of reentry should be integrated into the development of Reentry Simulations. Collaborating with returning citizens to create authentic scenarios ensures simulations accurately reflect the realities of reentry and keep up with our changing society. This participatory approach not only enhances the training experience for professionals but also empowers individuals who have navigated the reentry process, fostering a sense of unity and collaboration. As Reentry Simulations become more prevalent, there will be an increasing emphasis on evaluation and measuring outcomes. Community corrections agencies will need to establish metrics to assess the effectiveness of simulations in improving participants’ understanding

Photo courtesy Florida Department of Corrections

Corrections Today | Spring 2025

54